Eiland et al v. Citibank USA, N.A. et al

Plaintiff: Cubie Eiland and Quality Assurance Testing Laboratories, Inc.
Defendant: Citibank USA, N.A.
Case Number: 2:2007cv00238
Filed: March 16, 2007
Court: Alabama Middle District Court
Office: Montgomery Office
County: Montgomery
Referring Judge: Wallace Capel
Presiding Judge: William Keith Watkins
Nature of Suit: Fraud or Truth-In-Lending
Cause of Action: 15:1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Eiland et al v. Citibank USA, N.A. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Citibank USA, N.A.
Represented By: Patrick L. Lowther
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cubie Eiland
Represented By: Donald Gordon Madison
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Quality Assurance Testing Laboratories, Inc.
Represented By: Donald Gordon Madison
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?