Williams v. Siddiq et al (INMATE2)
||Ronnie V. Williams
||Dr. Siddiq, Prison Health Services, W. Nalls, Nurse Robinson and Nurse Mosley
||April 18, 2007
||US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
||Ira De Ment
||Terry F. Moorer
|Nature of Suit:
||Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition)
|Cause of Action:
||42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|July 30, 2009
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 1 Inmate 1983 Complaint filed by Ronnie V. Williams that: 1. Defendants' 17 MOTION for Summary Judgment be GRANTED to the extent Defendants seek dismissal of this case due to Plaintiff's failure to properly exhaust administrative remedies previously available to him at the Bullock County Correctional Facility; and 2. This case be DISMISSED with prejudice in accordance with the provisions of 42 U.S.C. 1997e(a) for Plaintiff's failure to exhaust administrative remedies available to him during his confinement at the Bullock County Correctional Facility. Objections to R&R due by 8/13/2009. Signed by Honorable Terry F. Moorer on 7/30/2009. (dmn)
|April 23, 2007
ORDER directing payment of initial partial filing fee of $7.83 be paid on or before 5/14/2007; Directing Monthly Payments be made from Inmate's Prison Account until fee is paid in full; granting 2 Affidavit for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis except to the extent payment is required under this order. Copies mailed to plaintiff and account clerk at Bullock Correctional Facility. Signed by Judge Terry F. Moorer on 4/23/2007. (dmn)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?