Richardson v. State of Alabama et al (INMATE 1)
||State of Alabama, Tracy S. McCooey, Eleanor Brooks and Troy King
||May 4, 2007
||US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
||XX US, Outside State
||Charles S. Coody
||William Keith Watkins
|Nature of Suit:
||Prisoner: Civil Rights
|Cause of Action:
||42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|May 10, 2007
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 1 Inmate 1983 Complaint, that the 1983 claims presented against the State of Alabama, Judge Tracy S. McCooey, Eleanor Brooks, and Troy King be dismissed with prejudice. The plaintiff's challenge to the constituti onality of the conviction and sentence imposed upon him by the Circuit Court of Montgomery County, Alabama for violation of the provisions of the Alabama Community Notification Act be dismissed without prejudice as such claims are not properly before the court at this time. This case be dismissed prior to service of process in accordance with the directives of 28 U.S.c. 1915(e)(2)(B)(i), (ii), and (iii). Objections to R&R due by 5/23/2007. Signed by Judge Charles S. Coody on 5/10/2007. (dmn)
|May 9, 2007
ORDER granting 2 Affidavit for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis except to the extent payment is required under this order; Directing Monthly Payments be made from Inmate's Prison Account until fee is paid in full; Copies mailed to plaintiff and account clerk the West Carroll Detention Center. Signed by Judge Charles S. Coody on 5/9/2007. (wcl, )
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?