Thomas v. State of Alabama et al (INMATE1)
Tyrone Thomas |
State of Alabama, Truman Hobbs and Winston D. Durant |
2:2007cv00498 |
June 6, 2007 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
Montgomery Office |
Montgomery |
Charles S. Coody |
Mark E. Fuller |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 1 Inmate 1983 Complaint filed by Tyrone Thomas, it is the Recommendation of the Mag Judge that: 1) The 1983 claims presented agaisnt the State of Alabama, Judge Truman Hobbs, Jr., and Winston Durant be dismissed with p rejudice in accord. with the directives of 28 USC 1919 (e)(2)(B)(i) and (ii); 2) The plaintiff's challenge to the constitutionality of the sentence imposed upon him by the CC of Mont Co., AL be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to the provisi ons as further set out as such cliams are not properly before the court at this time; 3) This case be dismissed prior to service of process in accord. with the directives as further set out. Objections to R&R due by 7/2/2007. Signed by Judge Charles S. Coody on 6/18/07. (vma, ) |
Filing 3 ORDER granting 2 Affidavit for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis except to the extent payment is required under this order; Directing Monthly Payments be made from Inmate's Prison Account until fee is paid in full; Copies mailed to plaintiff and account clerk at MCDF; cashier. Signed by Judge Charles S. Coody on 6/7/07. (vma, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.