Carter v. Dialysis Clinic, Inc.

Plaintiff: Margaret A. Carter
Defendant: Dialysis Clinic, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2007cv00682
Filed: July 26, 2007
Court: Alabama Middle District Court
Office: Montgomery Office
County: Bullock
Referring Judge: Charles S. Coody
Presiding Judge: William Keith Watkins
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 29:2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
October 22, 2008 30 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER that Defendant's 19 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED as further set out in the order. Signed by Honorable William Keith Watkins on 10/22/2008. (dmn)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Carter v. Dialysis Clinic, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Margaret A. Carter
Represented By: John D. Saxon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dialysis Clinic, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?