Emanuel v. George C. Wallace Community College

Plaintiff: Rich Emanuel
Defendant: George C. Wallace Community College
Case Number: 2:2007cv00819
Filed: September 12, 2007
Court: Alabama Middle District Court
Office: Civil Rights: Jobs Office
County: Autauga
Referring Judge: Susan Russ Walker
Presiding Judge: William Keith Watkins
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:2000 Job Discrimination (Race)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
January 20, 2009 46 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER, denying 36 MOTION for Attorney Fees filed by George C. Wallace Community College. Signed by Honorable William Keith Watkins on 1/20/09. (vma, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Emanuel v. George C. Wallace Community College
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rich Emanuel
Represented By: Adam Michael Porter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: George C. Wallace Community College
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?