Nails v. Brown

Plaintiff: Angela Denise Nails
Defendant: Tanya Brown
Case Number: 2:2007cv00948
Filed: October 23, 2007
Court: Alabama Middle District Court
Office: Montgomery Office
County: Pickens
0 Judge:
Referring Judge: Charles S. Coody
Presiding Judge: Mark E. Fuller
Nature of Suit: Assault Libel & Slander
Cause of Action: 28:1346 Tort Claim
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
October 25, 2007 4 Opinion or Order of the Court FINAL JUDGMENT in accordance with the Memorandum Opinion and Order entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the Court this action and Plf's claims be and hereby are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; DIRECTING the Clerk to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 FRCP. Signed by Judge Mark E. Fuller on 10/25/2007. (Attachments: # 1 civil appeals checklist)(wcl, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Nails v. Brown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Angela Denise Nails
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tanya Brown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?