Watson v. The United States of America et al
||Teddy A. Watson
||The United States of America, The State of Alabama, Jere L. Beasley, Barrack Obama, John McCain, Artur Davis, Michael Mukasey, Leura Canary and Troy King
||January 7, 2009
||US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
||Fraud or Truth-In-Lending Office
||William Keith Watkins
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
||U.S. Government Defendant
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|September 10, 2009
ORDER that Mr. Watson's 12 objection is OVERRULED; that 11 Report and Recommendations is ADOPTED; that Mr. Watson's 13 motion for leave to amend his complaint is DENIED; that Mr. Watson's claims are DISMISSED, without prejudice, for failure to establish federal subject matter jurisdiction; that all pending motions ( 9 , 10 and 13 ) are DENIED as moot. Signed by Honorable William Keith Watkins on 9/10/2009. (cc, )
|August 18, 2009
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS that Plf's Complaint, as amended, be DISMISSED for lack of subject matter jurisdiction due to Plf's failure to state a constitutionally substantial claim; that Plf's 9 MOTION For Leave to Amend With Attache d Copies of The Official Check For $147,445.88 And Notice From The Underlying CV-91-78 Case In The Circuit Court Of Lowndes County Alabama and 10 MOTION For The Court To Serve The Six Parties With The Summons And Documents Filed On 5/29/2009 And Also With What Being Filed Today be DENIED as moot; Objections to R&R due by 8/31/2009. Signed by Honorable Wallace Capel, Jr on 8/18/2009. (wcl, )
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?