CSX Transportation, Inc. v. Sylvest Farms, Inc.
CSX Transportation, Inc. |
Sylvest Farms, Inc. |
2:2009cv00083 |
January 30, 2009 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
Contract: Other Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Wallace Capel |
Myron H. Thompson |
None |
Federal Question |
49:10101 Interstate Commerce Act-Interstate Transportation Rail |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 OPINION. Signed by Honorable Myron H. Thompson on 5/8/2009. (cc, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: CSX Transportation, Inc. v. Sylvest Farms, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: CSX Transportation, Inc. | |
Represented By: | James R. Lloyd, III |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Sylvest Farms, Inc. | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.