Martinez-Mendoza et al v. Montgomery Deli, Inc. et al
| Ciro Martinez-Mendoza and Marcos Camilo-Gonzalez |
| Montgomery Deli, Inc. and Ramesh Gandhi |
| 2:2009cv00261 |
| March 30, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Labor: Fair Standards Office |
| Montgomery |
| Mark E. Fuller |
| Terry F. Moorer |
| Defendant |
| Federal Question |
| 29:201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
21
ORDER re 19 Notice of Mediation and Settlement Conference, by which the parties have advised the court that the attorneys for both Plaintiffs and Defendants believe that mediation would promote the resolution of this case. This court's mediati on program is voluntary, and generally, the court does not formally enter an order referring a case to a Magistrate Judge for mediation. Should the parties desire mediation of this case, they should arrange a conference call with the office of the Ma gistrate Judge assigned to this file to discuss scheduling the mediation. The Magistrate Judge assigned to this file is Magistrate Judge Terry F. Moorer. Of course, the parties are free to retain a mediator of their own choosing and pursue private mediation if they prefer it to the Court's mediation program. Signed by Hon. Chief Judge Mark E. Fuller on 11/19/2009. (dmn)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
