Cremeens v. The City of Montgomery, Alabama
Plaintiff: Gary Carl Cremeens
Defendant: The City of Montgomery, Alabama
Case Number: 2:2009cv00409
Filed: May 5, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
Office: Montgomery Office
County: Montgomery
Presiding Judge: W. Harold Albritton
Presiding Judge: Charles S. Coody
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 Job Discrimination
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 9, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 21 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER; the Defendant City of Montgomery's Motion for Summary Judgment 13 is ORDERED GRANTED as to all claims. Signed by Honorable W. Harold Albritton, III on 8/9/2010. (jg, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cremeens v. The City of Montgomery, Alabama
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gary Carl Cremeens
Represented By: Heather Newsom Leonard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The City of Montgomery, Alabama
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?