United States of America v. $246,017.03 in funds seized from BankTrust account number xxxxxx1548 in the name of Falguni, Inc. Reserve for Loss Account

Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: $246,017.03 in funds seized from BankTrust account number xxxxxx1548 in the name of Falguni, Inc. Reserve for Loss Account
Case Number: 2:2009cv00664
Filed: July 15, 2009
Court: Alabama Middle District Court
Office: Montgomery Office
County: Dallas
Presiding Judge: William Keith Watkins
Referring Judge: Charles S. Coody
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 18:0981 Civil forfeiture
Jury Demanded By: None

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States of America v. $246,017.03 in funds seized from BankTrust account number xxxxxx1548 in the name of Falguni, Inc. Reserve for Loss Account
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: United States of America
Represented By: Robert Randolph Neeley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: $246,017.03 in funds seized from BankTrust account number xxxxxx1548 in the name of Falguni, Inc. Reserve for Loss Account
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?