Hermeling v. Eli Lilly and Company

Plaintiff: Donald Hermeling
Defendant: Eli Lilly and Company
Case Number: 2:2009cv00748
Filed: August 6, 2009
Court: Alabama Middle District Court
Office: Montgomery Office
County: Crenshaw
Presiding Judge: William Keith Watkins
Referring Judge: Terry F. Moorer
Nature of Suit: Both
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
February 3, 2010 15 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 7 MOTION to Remand; that this case is REMANDED to the Circuit Court of Crenshaw County, Alabama; DIRECTING the Clerk to take all steps necessary to effect the remand. Signed by Honorable William Keith Watkins on 2/3/2010. Certified Copy mailed to Clerk, Circuit Court of Crenshaw County.(wcl, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hermeling v. Eli Lilly and Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Donald Hermeling
Represented By: Leah Oldacre Taylor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Eli Lilly and Company
Represented By: Alan Daniel Mathis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?