Vargas v. United States of America (INMATE 3)
||Carlos Vargas, Jr.
||United States of America
||August 13, 2009
||US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
||XX US, Outside State
||Susan Russ Walker
||William Keith Watkins
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
||28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|July 24, 2012
ORDER that 45 Report and Recommendations is ADOPTED; that Petitioner's § 2255 motion is DENIED because the claims therein entitle him to no relief; that this case is DISMISSED with prejudice; that an appropriate final judgment will be entered. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 7/24/2012. (cc, )
|June 8, 2011
ORDER: that the Federal Defender for the Middle District of Alabama is appointed to represent Vargas on the issues set for an evidentiary hearing; that pursuant to this appointment and limited purpose, counsel shall proceed to confer with Vargas and otherwise make an appropriate investigation concerning said issues; that a pretrial conference with counsel for Vargas and counsel forthe United States is scheduled for 9/1/2011 10:00 AM in Courtroom 5B before Honorable Judge Susan Russ Walker; that an Evidentiary Hearing is set for 9/7/2011 10:00 AM in Courtroom 5B before Honorable Judge Susan Russ Walker. Signed by Honorable Judge Susan Russ Walker on 6/8/2011. Copy sent to Federal Defender as directed.(cc, ) Modified on 6/8/2011 to reflect that a copy of this order was mailed to plaintiff (cc, ).
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?