Brinson v. Darbouze et al (INMATE 1)
Alexander Brinson |
Kay Wilson, Dr. Darbouze, Nurse Sammons, Nurse Cauley, Nurse Bush, Nurse Peterson and Nurse Dozier |
2:2009cv01022 |
November 5, 2009 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
Montgomery Office |
Barbour |
Ira De Ment |
Terry F. Moorer |
Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 29 ORDER: On 3/9/2010, this Court entered an Order (Doc. No. 27 ) adopting the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge issued on 11/10/2009 (Doc. No. 3 ), and Final Judgment (Doc. No. 28 ), which dismissed the case without prejudice. These entries wer e made in error, as Plaintiff received a second extension of time, through 3/25/2010, in which to object to the Recommendation. See Doc. 26 . Accordingly, for good cause, the Order (Doc. No. 27 ) and Final Judgment (Doc. No. 28 ) are hereby VACATED. Signed by Honorable Ira De Ment on 3/10/2010. (dmn) |
Filing 3 ORDER AND RECOMMENDATION re 1 Inmate 1983 Complaint filed by Alexander Brinson, ORDERED that the 2 Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit be and is hereby DENIED. Additionally, it is the RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge that this case be dismissed without prejudice for the plaintiff's failure to pay the full filing fee upon the initiation of this case. Objections to R&R due by 11/24/2009. Signed by Honorable Terry F. Moorer on 11/10/2009. (dmn) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.