Sterling v. Riley et al (INMATE 1)
||Reginald Lynn Sterling
||Troy King, Bob Riley, Tim Russell, Robert Childree, Alabama Department of Economic Community Affairs, Henry Mabry, Kay Ivey, Richard Allen, The Alabama Department of Pardon & Paroles and Carolyn Golson
||February 16, 2010
||US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
||Truman M. Hobbs
|Nature of Suit:
||Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition)
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|February 18, 2010
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of the Magistrate Judge that: (1)To the extent the plaintiff seeks enforcement of prior orders or consent decrees, all claims related to such orders/decrees be summarily DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant tothe directives of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii); (2) With respect to those claims the plaintiff seeks to present regarding the legal rights or interests of other persons, these claims be DISMISSED with prejudice in accordance withthe provisions of 28 U.S.C. 7; 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii); (3) The plaintiffs claims arising from actions taken against him during his incarceration at the Limestone Correctional Facility be DISMISSED without prejudice to the rights of the plaintiff to file a separate 42 U.S.C. § 1 983 action in United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama; (4) The plaintiffs request for class certification be DENIED; and (5) The plaintiffs motion for preliminary injunction be DENIED. Objections to R&R due by 3/3/2010 Signed by Honorable Wallace Capel, Jr on 2/18/2010. (cb, )
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?