Carthen v. Baptist South Medical Center et al(INMATE 1)
| Tremane D. Carthen |
| Baptist South Medical Center, Executive Hospital Administrator and Jerry Gurley |
| 2:2010cv00281 |
| March 29, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Montgomery Office |
| Truman M. Hobbs |
| Terry F. Moorer |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
41
ORDER directing that the 37 Report and Recommendations is ADOPTED as follows: (1) Mr. Carthen's 40 Response is DENIED as untimely; (2) Mr. Carthen's claims are DISMISSED without prejudice; and (3) Defendant Baptist South Medical Center's 23 Motion to Dismiss, or in the alternative Motion for More Definite Statement, is DENIED as moot, as further set out. Signed by Honorable William Keith Watkins on 5/17/11. (scn, )
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER AND OPINION ON MOTION directing payment of initial partial filing fee of $16.67 be paid on or beforen4/21/2010; Directing Monthly Payments be made from Inmate's Prison Account until fee is paid in full; granting 2 Affidavit for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis except to the extent payment is required under this order. Copies mailed to plaintiff and account clerk at Limestone Correctional Facility. Signed by Honorable Terry F. Moorer on 4/1/2010.(dmn)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
