Broderick v. Astrue

Plaintiff: Ronald S. Broderick
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Case Number: 2:2010cv00903
Filed: October 26, 2010
Court: Alabama Middle District Court
Office: Montgomery Office
County: Elmore
Presiding Judge: Terry F. Moorer
Nature of Suit: Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action: 42:405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
April 25, 2011 21 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER that 1. Mr. Broderick's Objection 19 is OVERRULED. 2. The Magistrate Judge's Recommendation 18 is ADOPTED. 3. The Motion to Dismiss filed by the Commissioner 12 is GRANTED, and Mr. Broderick's Complaint is DISMISSED for failure to state a claim for which relief can be granted, pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6). An appropriate judgment will be entered. Signed by Honorable William Keith Watkins on 4/25/2011. (jg, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Broderick v. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ronald S. Broderick
Represented By: Lawrence F. Gardella
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?