Carr v. Harris et al (INMATE1)
||Tony Lee Carr
||Officer Harris and Officer More
||March 3, 2011
||US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
||Truman M. Hobbs
||Terry F. Moorer
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|March 6, 2014
ORDER directing that, after an independent review of the file, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court that: (1) The plaintiff's objection (Doc. # 22 ) to the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge filed on February 25, 2014 is overrul ed; (2) The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. # 19 ) entered on January 22, 2014 is adopted; (3) The defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED to the extent that the defendants seek dismissal of this case due to the plaintiff 's failure to properly exhaust an administrative remedy provided to him by the Alabama Department of Corrections; (4) This case is DISMISSED with prejudice in accordance with the provisions of 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a) for the plaintiff's failure to properly exhaust an administrative remedy provided to him as this remedy with respect to the pending claims for relief is no longer feasible. Signed by Honorable Judge Mark E. Fuller on 3/6/14. (scn, )
|March 7, 2011
ORDER ON MOTION Directing Monthly Payments be made from Inmate's Prison Account until fee is paid in full; granting 2 Affidavit for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis except to the extent payment is required under this order. Copies mailed to plaintiff and account clerk at the Staton Correctional Facility. Signed by Honorable Terry F. Moorer on 3/7/2011. (br, )
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?