Frazier v. Fuller (INMATE1)

Frazier v. Fuller (INMATE1)

Plaintiff:	James Calvin Frazier
Defendant:	Ben Fuller
Case Number:	2:2011cv00159
Filed:	March 7, 2011
Court:	US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
Office:	Montgomery Office
County:	Barbour
Presiding Judge:	Truman M. Hobbs
Presiding Judge:	Wallace Capel
Nature of Suit:	Civil Rights
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 29, 2011	Filing 6 ORDER overruling plaintiff's 5 Objection; that 4 Report and Recommendations is adopted; that plaintiff's challenges to orders issued and/or actions taken by Judge Ben Fuller on petitions/motions litigated in the Circuit Court of Autauga County, Alabama, are DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of process in accordance with the directives of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and (ii); that plaintiff's claims attacking the legality of the sentence imposed upon him by the Ci rcuit Court of Autauga County, Alabama, for second degree theft of property is summarily dismissed pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii); that this case is DISMISSED. Signed by Honorable Truman M. Hobbs on 3/29/2011. (cc, )
March 8, 2011	Filing 3 ORDER ON MOTION Directing Monthly Payments be made from Inmate's Prison Account until fee is paid in full; granting 2 Affidavit for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis except to the extent payment is required under this order. Copies mailed to plaintiff and account clerk at the Ventress Correctional Facility. Signed by Honorable Wallace Capel, Jr on 3/8/2011. (br, )

Date Filed

Document Text

March 29, 2011

Filing 6 ORDER overruling plaintiff's 5 Objection; that 4 Report and Recommendations is adopted; that plaintiff's challenges to orders issued and/or actions taken by Judge Ben Fuller on petitions/motions litigated in the Circuit Court of Autauga County, Alabama, are DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of process in accordance with the directives of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and (ii); that plaintiff's claims attacking the legality of the sentence imposed upon him by the Ci rcuit Court of Autauga County, Alabama, for second degree theft of property is summarily dismissed pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii); that this case is DISMISSED. Signed by Honorable Truman M. Hobbs on 3/29/2011. (cc, )

March 8, 2011

Filing 3 ORDER ON MOTION Directing Monthly Payments be made from Inmate's Prison Account until fee is paid in full; granting 2 Affidavit for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis except to the extent payment is required under this order. Copies mailed to plaintiff and account clerk at the Ventress Correctional Facility. Signed by Honorable Wallace Capel, Jr on 3/8/2011. (br, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Frazier v. Fuller (INMATE1)
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: James Calvin Frazier
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Ben Fuller
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?