Gachett v. Retail Wholesale Department Store Union

Plaintiff: Henry Gachett
Defendant: Retail Wholesale Department Store Union
Case Number: 2:2011cv00398
Filed: May 25, 2011
Court: Alabama Middle District Court
Office: Montgomery Office
County: Bullock
Presiding Judge: Mark E. Fuller
Referring Judge: Wallace Capel
Nature of Suit: Labor/Management Relations
Cause of Action: 29:185
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
February 18, 2014 31 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER granting 25 Motion to Dismiss and Gachett's 24 Amended Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Honorable Judge Mark E. Fuller on 2/18/2014. (wcl, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gachett v. Retail Wholesale Department Store Union
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Retail Wholesale Department Store Union
Represented By: George N Davies
Represented By: Matthew S Swerdlin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Henry Gachett
Represented By: Valerie Rucker Russell
Represented By: Charles James, II
Represented By: Jock Michael Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?