Pelham v. City of Daphne, Alabama et al(CONSENT)

Plaintiff: Tiffany Pelham
Defendant: City of Daphne, Alabama and David Carpenter
Case Number: 2:2011cv01021
Filed: December 1, 2011
Court: Alabama Middle District Court
Office: Montgomery Office
County: Elmore
Presiding Judge: Wallace Capel
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42:2000
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pelham v. City of Daphne, Alabama et al(CONSENT)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tiffany Pelham
Represented By: Elizabeth Peyton Faulk
Represented By: Anthony B. Bush
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Daphne, Alabama
Represented By: Mallory M. Combest
Represented By: Robert Jason Crane
Represented By: Jay Michael Ross
Represented By: Terry Alan Sides
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: David Carpenter
Represented By: Mallory M. Combest
Represented By: Robert Jason Crane
Represented By: Jay Michael Ross
Represented By: Terry Alan Sides
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?