Beauchamp et al v. Wallace et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|October 11, 2013
ORDER directing that the 129 motion to dismiss is denied in part and granted in part, as further set out. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 10/11/13. (scn, )
|October 15, 2012
OPINION AND ORDER directing that, based on the representations made on the record on October 12, 2012, it is ORDERED as follows: (1) The motions for hearing (doc. nos. 65 and 66 ) are denied, as further set out; (2) The motion to vacate, etc. (doc . no. 66 ) is denied, as further set out; (3) The pending motions to dismiss (doc. nos. 59 and 60 ) apply to the fourth amended complaint (doc. no. 62 ); Counsel for plaintiffs has informed the court that there is no substantive difference betwe en the third and fourth amended complaints (doc. nos. 52 and 62 ); (4) Because the uniform scheduling order (doc. no. 23 )'s deadline for filing amendments to pleadings (May 15, 2012) has long passed, plaintiffs' counsel is DIRECTED NOT to file another amended complaint without first meeting ALL of the following three requirements: (i) Plaintiffs' counsel must first seek and obtain leave of the court; (ii) Plaintiffs' counsel must comply with Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, as further set out; and (iii) Plaintiffs' counsel would finally have to meet the requirements of Rule 15 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 10/15/12. (scn, )
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?