Markel American Insurance Company v. Norris et al (STAYED)

Plaintiff: Markel American Insurance Company
Defendant: John E. Norris, Davis & Norris, LLP and T.C.D.
Case Number: 2:2012cv00080
Filed: January 26, 2012
Court: Alabama Middle District Court
Office: Montgomery Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Susan Russ Walker
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28:2201
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
September 3, 2013 56 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER directing as follows: (1) The 32 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, as further set out; (2) All of Markel's claims relating to a declaration concerning its duty to indemnify are DISMISSED without prejudice as premature. Signed by Honorable Judge Mark E. Fuller on 9/3/13. (scn, )
March 15, 2013 51 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER directing that Markel's 50 Motion for Continuance is granted to the extent that it requests that the Court continue generally the pretrial and trial dates and order the parties to conduct a scheduling conference to establish a new trial date and related deadlines, but it is denied to the extent that it asks the Court to rescind the Scheduling Order entered in this case; it is hereby ORDERED that: (1) All remaining deadlines in the 33 Scheduling Order, including the pretrial confer ence and trial dates, are CONTINUED GENERALLY; (2) The parties shall meet in person on or before April 11, 2013, to conduct the conference required by Rule 26(f) to reestablish deadlines and a trial date for this action; and (3) The parties shall fil e, on or before April 25, 2013, a report of the parties planning meeting, which proposes a new trial date and related deadlines, and which informs the Court of the new trial date in the underlying case, as further set out. Signed by Honorable Judge Mark E. Fuller on 3/15/13. (Furnished to Calendar/WR)(Term'd: Final PTC 06/13/2013, Non-Jury Trial 07/15/2013) (scn, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Markel American Insurance Company v. Norris et al (STAYED)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John E. Norris
Represented By: Andrew Scott Herring
Represented By: D. Frank Davis
Represented By: Wesley W Barnett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Davis & Norris, LLP
Represented By: Wesley W Barnett
Represented By: D. Frank Davis
Represented By: Andrew Scott Herring
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: T.C.D.
Represented By: Thomas Scott McGrath
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Markel American Insurance Company
Represented By: Benjamin J. Zimmern
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?