Markel American Insurance Company v. Norris et al (STAYED)
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|September 3, 2013
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER directing as follows: (1) The 32 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, as further set out; (2) All of Markel's claims relating to a declaration concerning its duty to indemnify are DISMISSED without prejudice as premature. Signed by Honorable Judge Mark E. Fuller on 9/3/13. (scn, )
|March 15, 2013
ORDER directing that Markel's 50 Motion for Continuance is granted to the extent that it requests that the Court continue generally the pretrial and trial dates and order the parties to conduct a scheduling conference to establish a new trial date and related deadlines, but it is denied to the extent that it asks the Court to rescind the Scheduling Order entered in this case; it is hereby ORDERED that: (1) All remaining deadlines in the 33 Scheduling Order, including the pretrial confer ence and trial dates, are CONTINUED GENERALLY; (2) The parties shall meet in person on or before April 11, 2013, to conduct the conference required by Rule 26(f) to reestablish deadlines and a trial date for this action; and (3) The parties shall fil e, on or before April 25, 2013, a report of the parties planning meeting, which proposes a new trial date and related deadlines, and which informs the Court of the new trial date in the underlying case, as further set out. Signed by Honorable Judge Mark E. Fuller on 3/15/13. (Furnished to Calendar/WR)(Term'd: Final PTC 06/13/2013, Non-Jury Trial 07/15/2013) (scn, )
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?