Willett v. The Veterans Administration of the United States of America et al
| Charlie Mae Willett |
| The Veterans Administration of the United States of America, Clifford Robinson and Patricia Henley |
| 2:2012cv00296 |
| April 3, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Montgomery Office |
| Montgomery |
| Susan Russ Walker |
| William Keith Watkins |
| Other Personal Injury |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2671 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
52
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER that the United State's 41 Renewed Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED as further set out in the opinion and order. A separate judgment will be entered. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 6/3/2014. (dmn, )
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER DENYING 27 MOTION to Dismiss; defendant may refile its motion on or before 9/9/2013; further ORDERING that plaintiff is GRANTED LEAVE to conduct limited jurisdictional discovery, as further set out in order; further ORDERING that based on said discovery, plaintiff should file any Response to any Motion to dismiss from defendant on or before 9/30/2013; the defendant's Reply Brief, if any, shall be filed on or before 10/7/2013, as further set out in order; further ORDERING that plaintiff's 33 MOTION to Strike is DENIED, as further set out in order. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 6/27/13. (djy, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
