Osburn v. Panetta et al
||Leon E. Panetta and Timothy Tarver
||April 17, 2012
||US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
||Myron H. Thompson
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
||42 U.S.C. § 1981
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|September 15, 2014
OPINION AND ORDER directing that the motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 131 ) filed by defendant Chuck Hagel, in his capacity of Secretary of the Department of Defense, is denied in all respects except as to plaintiff Sharon Osburn's claim of retaliatory opposition to her request for worker's compensation; the court reserves ruling at this time on this claim of retaliatory opposition to plaintiff Osburn's request for worker's compensation; further ORDERED that the retaliatory constructive-discharge claim is dismissed as abandoned. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 9/15/14. (scn, )
|September 8, 2014
ORDER directing that, upon consideration of the parties' motions in limine (Doc. Nos. 168 , 177 , 178 , & 179 ), motion to strike (Doc. No. 169 ), and objections (Doc. Nos. 170 , 171 , & 180 ), it is ORDERED that counsel for all parties are to do the following: (1) Meet, in person, by no later than September 11, 2014, to attempt to resolve the motions and objections; and (2) File a jointly prepared report by September 16, 2014,(a) as to which issues in the motions and objections are resolved and which ones remain unresolved and (b), for each and every unresolved issue, setting forth in detail the position of each side. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 9/8/14. (scn, )
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?