Luker v. Darbouse (INMATE 1)

Plaintiff: Clarence Luker
Defendant: Dr. Darbouse
Case Number: 2:2012cv00557
Filed: June 28, 2012
Court: Alabama Middle District Court
Office: Montgomery Office
County: Escambia
Presiding Judge: Truman M. Hobbs
Referring Judge: Terry F. Moorer
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
June 17, 2014 51 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that: 1) The dft's 23 motion for summary judgment be GRANTED; 2) Judgment be GRANTED in favor of the dfts; 3) This case be DISMISSED with prejudice; 4) Costs be taxed against the plf. Signed by Honorable Judge Terry F. Moorer on 6/17/2014. (wcl, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Luker v. Darbouse (INMATE 1)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dr. Darbouse
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Clarence Luker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?