Thomason v. One West Bank, FSB, Indy Mac Bank (MAG+)
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|March 11, 2016
OPINION AND ORDER: Pending before the court are the 56 Motion to Dismiss filed by defendants OneWest Bank, FSB, Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC, Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as Trustee for Home Equity Mortgage Loan Asset-BackedTrust Series INAPS 2006-A, Home Equity Mortgage Loan Asset-Backed Certificates Series INABS 2006-A and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., and defendant Eva Bank's 66 Motion to Dismiss and/or Require a More Definite Statement. Also pending before t he court are plaintiff's motions for summary judgment, one contained within his response to the motion to dismiss (doc. no. 68 ) and one filed separately (doc. no. 69 ), as well as defendants motionto strike (doc. no. 71 ) plaintiffs second m otion for summary judgment.On 3/1/2016, the United States Magistrate Judge entered an order (doc. no. 76 ) explaining that, after careful review of the amended complaint (doc. no. 49 ), he determined that the plaintiff may benefit from participation in the Pro Se Assistance Program (PSAP). The undersigned agrees. Accordingly, it is ORDERED as follows: (1) The motions to dismiss the amended complaint (doc. nos. 56 and 66 ) are denied with leave to renew. (2) The motion to require a more defin ite statement (doc. no. 66 ) is granted. The magistrate judge is toset an appropriate deadline for producing said more definite statement, once the issue of counsel for plaintiff has been resolved. (3) The motions for summary judgment (doc. nos. [68 ]and 69 ) are denied as premature. (4) The motion to strike (doc. no. 71 ) the motions for summary judgment is denied as moot. This case is referred back to the magistrate judge for further proceedings. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 3/11/2016. (dmn, )
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?