Etteinne v. Hassell (INMATE 3)

Plaintiff: Raphael Colin Etteinne
Defendant: Scott Hassell
Case Number: 2:2012cv00779
Filed: September 10, 2012
Court: Alabama Middle District Court
Office: Montgomery Office
County: Etowah
Presiding Judge: Truman M. Hobbs
Referring Judge: Wallace Capel
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28:2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
October 30, 2012 4 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER directing that, after an independent review of the entire record, the court finds that the Recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Recommendation (Doc. 3 ) of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED and this case is TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama for all further proceedings. Signed by Honorable Judge Truman M. Hobbs on 10/30/12. (scn, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Etteinne v. Hassell (INMATE 3)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Scott Hassell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Raphael Colin Etteinne
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?