Escobedo-Merida v. Northern/Lucas Machine, Inc.

Plaintiff: Jorge Escobedo-Merida
Defendant: Northern/Lucas Machine, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2012cv00869
Filed: October 5, 2012
Court: Alabama Middle District Court
Office: Montgomery Office
County: XX Outside US
Presiding Judge: Mark E. Fuller
Referring Judge: Wallace Capel
Nature of Suit: Personal Inj. Prod. Liability
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
February 14, 2013 14 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER granting 12 Motion to Intervene, as further set out. Signed by Honorable Judge Mark E. Fuller on 2/14/13. (scn, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Escobedo-Merida v. Northern/Lucas Machine, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jorge Escobedo-Merida
Represented By: Sigfredo Rubio
Represented By: Kendall C. Dunson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Northern/Lucas Machine, Inc.
Represented By: Shane Michael Oncale
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?