Vinson v. Koch Foods of Alabama, LLC et al
Maria N. Vinson |
Koch Foods of Alabama, LLC and Koch Foods, LLC |
2:2012cv01088 |
December 14, 2012 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
Montgomery Office |
Montgomery |
Mark E. Fuller |
Susan Russ Walker |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 Job Discrimination (Race) |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 342 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: it is ORDERED that the Plaintiff's objections to the bill of costs are OVERRULED in part and SUSTAINED in part and costs are TAXED against the Plaintiff in the amount of $12,816.38. Signed by Chief Judge Emily C. Marks on 5/8/2023. (amf, ) |
Filing 195 ORDER: granting 73 Defendant Koch Foods, LLC's Motion for Summary Judgement; granting 75 Defendants Koch Foods of Alabama, LLC and David Birchfield's Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 179 Defendants Motion for Leave to Supplement i ts Evidentiary Submission in Support of its Motion for Summary Judgment as MOOT; and striking 177 Defendants Objections to Declarations of Maria Vinson, Patrick Rinn, and Alesia Simmons as MOOT. Signed by Honorable Judge Barbara J. Rothstein on 11/29/2016. (kh, ) |
Filing 13 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER directing as follows: (1) Defendants' 8 motion to dismiss Vinson's § 1981 claim (Count 1) is GRANTED to the extent it is based on discriminatory pay, failure to promote to any position other than Professi onal Development and Training and night HR manager, and retaliation, and these claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; Defendants' motion to dismiss Vinson's § 1981 claim is DENIED in all other respects; (2) Defendants' 8 motion to dismiss Vinson's Title VII national origin claim (Count 2) is GRANTED to the extent it is based on discriminatory pay, failure to promote, and retaliation, and these claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; (3) Defendants' 8 motion to dis miss Vinson's Title VII gender discrimination claim (Count 3) is GRANTED, and this claim is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; (4) Defendants' 8 motion to dismiss Vinson's state law claims for negligent and wanton hiring/supervision, invasion of privacy, and intentional infliction of emotional distress (Counts 4 - 6) is GRANTED, and these claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; (5) Defendants' 8 motion to dismiss Vinson's hostile work environment claims is DENIED AS MOOT; (6) P laintiff's 11 Motion for Leave to Amend is GRANTED as to her §1981 claim only; Plaintiff shall file an Amended Complaint no later than September 30 2013, correcting the deficiencies of this claim, or her § 1981 claim based on discriminatory pay, failure to promote to positions other than the Professional Development and Training and night HR management positions, and retaliation will be dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Honorable Judge Mark E. Fuller on 9/27/13. (scn, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.