N.D. v. Golden et al
| N.D. |
| Bo Knight, Brett Wadsworth, Mark M. Golden, P.K. Johnson and City of Millbrook |
| 2:2013cv00540 |
| July 26, 2013 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Montgomery Office |
| Elmore |
| Mark E. Fuller |
| Terry F. Moorer |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
29
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER directing that, upon consideration of the motions, for the reasons as stated, and for good cause, it is ORDERED as follows: (1) Insofar as Defendants' subpoena requests psychotherapy records contained in Plaintiff� 39;s Stanhope Elmore High School record, the Plaintiff's Motion to Quash Subpoenas to Stanhope Elmore High School or, in the alternative, for a Protective Order (Doc. 26 ), be and is hereby DENIED; (2) Plaintiff's Alternative Motion for P rotective Order (Doc. 26 ) be and is hereby GRANTED; the parties have until on or before May 14, 2014 to submit a joint proposed protective order to govern Plaintiff's psychiatric treatment records; and (3) Insofar as Defendants' subpoena requests Plaintiff's complete Stanhope Elmore High School record, the Plaintiff's Motion to Quash Subpoenas to Stanhope Elmore High School or, in the alternative, for a Protective Order (Doc. 26 ) be and is hereby GRANTED. Signed by Honorable Judge Terry F. Moorer on 5/1/14. (scn, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
