Hendricks v. Higgins, et al. (INMATE 1)
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|March 5, 2014
OPINION AND ORDER directing that, after a review of the recommendation, to which no timely objections have been filed, and after an independent review of the entire record, it is it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows that: (1) The Recommendation of t he Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED; (2) The plaintiff's claims for declaratory relief with respect to orders issued/actions undertaken by the state court in his pending criminal case be and are hereby DISMISSED in accordance with the d irectives of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i); (3) The plaintiff's claims relative to pending criminal charges be and are hereby DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii); and (4) This case be and is hereby DISMISSED prior to service of process. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 3/5/14. (scn, )
|February 3, 2014
ORDER denying 7 Motion for appointment of counsel. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 2/3/14. (scn, )
|January 13, 2014
ORDER granting 2 Affidavit for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis except to the extent payment is required under this order; Directing Monthly Payments be made from Inmate's Prison Account until fee is paid in full; furnished to the inmate account clerk at the Montgomery County Detention Facility. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 1/13/14. (scn, )
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?