Overall v. State of Alabama(MAG+)
Plaintiff: Mark Overall
Defendant: State of Alabama
Case Number: 2:2014cv00576
Filed: June 9, 2014
Court: U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
Office: Montgomery Office
County: Montgomery
Presiding Judge: Mark E. Fuller
Presiding Judge: Wallace Capel
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 26, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER that the 11 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED, and this case is DISMISSED for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. A separate judgment shall issue. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 8/26/2014. (dmn, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Overall v. State of Alabama(MAG+)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mark Overall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: State of Alabama
Represented By: Cecil Gordon Brendle, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?