United States of America v. $35,000.00 in funds seized from Regions Bank Internal "Wire Transfer Holdover Account" number xxx0643
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: $35,000.00 in funds seized from Regions Bank Internal "Wire Transfer Holdover Account" Number xxx0643
Case Number: 2:2014cv00902
Filed: August 27, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
Office: Montgomery Office
County: Montgomery
Presiding Judge: Terry F. Moorer
Presiding Judge: W. Harold Albritton
Nature of Suit: Other
Cause of Action: 18 U.S.C. ยง 0981
Jury Demanded By: None
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States of America v. $35,000.00 in funds seized from Regions Bank Internal "Wire Transfer Holdover Account" number xxx0643
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: United States of America
Represented By: Kevin P Davidson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: $35,000.00 in funds seized from Regions Bank Internal "Wire Transfer Holdover Account" Number xxx0643
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?