Hall v. Dolgencorp, LLC(MAG+)

Plaintiff: Emily L. Hall
Defendant: Dolgencorp, LLC
Case Number: 2:2015cv00076
Filed: January 29, 2015
Court: Alabama Middle District Court
Office: Montgomery Office
County: Autauga
Referring Judge: Charles S. Coody
Presiding Judge: William Keith Watkins
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42:2000
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
June 4, 2015 16 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER ADOPTING 15 Recommendation, and this case is DISMISSED without prejudice based upon Plaintiff's abandonment of her claims, failure to prosecute this action, and failure to comply with the orders of the court. A separate final judgment will be entered. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 6/4/2015. (dmn, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hall v. Dolgencorp, LLC(MAG+)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Emily L. Hall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dolgencorp, LLC
Represented By: Stanley Eugene Graham
Represented By: Brittany R Stancombe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?