ECMC v. Acosta-Conniff
||Alexandra Elizabeth Acosta-Conniff
||April 8, 2015
||Alabama Middle District Court
||William Keith Watkins
|Nature of Suit:
||Bankruptcy Appeal (801)
|Cause of Action:
||28:0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BA
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|January 5, 2018
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: for the foregoing reasons, directing that the bankruptcy court must make additional findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether Ms. Conniff has satisfied her burden of proving each of the three Brunner ele ments. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that this case is REMANDED to the bankruptcy court for further fact-finding and legal determinations consistent with the Eleventh Circuits and this courts opinions, as further set out in order. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 1/5/18. Electronically furnished to bankruptcy court.(djy, )
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?