Posey v. Hyundai Motor Manufacturing Alabama et al
Plaintiff: Daniel Posey
Defendant: Hyundai Motor Manufacturing Alabama and The Hartford Comprehensive Employee Benefit Services Company
Case Number: 2:2015cv00787
Filed: October 27, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
Office: Montgomery Office
County: St. Clair
Presiding Judge: William Keith Watkins
Presiding Judge: Wallace Capel
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12111
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 17, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 72 OPINION: it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows: 1) That the 71 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED; 2) That the dft's 57 motion for summary judgment be and is hereby GRANTED; 3) That this case be and is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice; 4) Costs of this proceeding are taxed against the plf; A separate final judgment will be entered in accordance with this order. Signed by Honorable Judge Emily C. Marks on 9/17/2018. (alm, )
April 4, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 39 ORDERED that (1) The 36 Recommendation is ADOPTED; (2) Defendant The Hartford's 17 Motion to Dismiss is DENIED as moot because Plaintiff voluntarily dismissed all of his claims against The Hartford pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i); (3) Defend ant Hartford is DISMISSED as a defendant in this cause of action based on Plaintiff's 31 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal; (4) Defendant Hyundai's Preliminary 21 Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Class Allegations and 20 Motion for Parti al Judgment on the Pleadings are DENIED as moot; (5) The claims against Defendant Hyundai omitted from the amended complaint, including Plaintiff's class claims under the FMLA, ADA, and state law and Plaintiff's individual claims under the FMLA and state law are DISMISSED without prejudice; and (6) This case is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 4/4/2016. (kh, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Posey v. Hyundai Motor Manufacturing Alabama et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Daniel Posey
Represented By: Daniel Eduardo Arciniegas
Represented By: Jon Craig Goldfarb
Represented By: Lachlan William Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hyundai Motor Manufacturing Alabama
Represented By: John James Coleman, III
Represented By: Henry Carlton Hilson
Represented By: Joseph Trent Scofield
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Hartford Comprehensive Employee Benefit Services Company
Represented By: Lee Edmundson Bains, Jr.
Represented By: Warren Bricken Lightfoot, Jr.
Represented By: Tiffany Parrish Rainbolt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?