Hughes v. Palomar Insurance Corporation et al

Plaintiff: Amanda C. Hughes
Defendant: Palomar Insurance Corporation and Marion Parker
Case Number: 2:2016cv00005
Filed: January 4, 2016
Court: Alabama Middle District Court
Office: Montgomery Office
County: Montgomery
Presiding Judge: Terry F. Moorer
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42:2000
Jury Demanded By: Both

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hughes v. Palomar Insurance Corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Amanda C. Hughes
Represented By: John David Saxon(Designation Retained)
Represented By: John David Saxon, Jr.(Designation Retained)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Palomar Insurance Corporation
Represented By: Michelle L. McClafferty
Represented By: Taffiny Smith Stewart
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Marion Parker
Represented By: Michelle L. McClafferty
Represented By: Taffiny Smith Stewart
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?