Merritt v. Colvin

Plaintiff: Latisha F. Merritt
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Case Number: 2:2016cv00125
Filed: February 25, 2016
Court: Alabama Middle District Court
Office: Montgomery Office
County: Montgomery
Presiding Judge: Gray M. Borden
Nature of Suit: Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action: 42:405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
August 3, 2017 15 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER directing that the decision of the Commissioner is REVERSED and REMANDED for the Commissioner to conduct further proceedings consistent with this opinion, to include further consideration of Dr. Lipscomb's opinions provided in the Medical Source Statement, as further set out in order. Signed by Honorable Judge Gray M. Borden on 8/3/17. Also mailed to SSA Office of Hearings and Appeals and SSA Chief Judge.(djy, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Merritt v. Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Latisha F. Merritt
Represented By: Sheila Kay Dansby
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?