Cook Bey v. Luckie et al (INMATE 2)
| Kendrick Cook Bey |
| Camille Luckie, Leeposey Daniels and Jefferson S. Dunn |
| 2:2016cv00307 |
| April 29, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Montgomery Office |
| Barbour |
| Gray M. Borden |
| W. Harold Albritton |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
50
OPINION AND ORDER: it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED, and this case be and is hereby DISMISSED as follows: 1. Defendants' 30 motion for summary judgment is GRANTED; 2. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice; 3. Costs are taxed against Plaintiff. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 7/2/2019. (kr, )
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER: it is ORDERED that the Court adopts the 44 Recommendation and the 43 Motion for Preliminary Injunction is DENIED; This case is referred to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 3/13/2019. (kr, )
|
|
Filing
19
ORDERED that: 1) The 14 Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; 2) The 12 Motion for Preliminary Injunction is DENIED; 3) This case is referred to the United States Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 8/9/2016. (wcl, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
