Gunn v. Elmore County Board of Education

Plaintiff: Freddie Gunn
Defendant: Elmore County Board of Education
Case Number: 2:2016cv00548
Filed: July 6, 2016
Court: Alabama Middle District Court
Office: Montgomery Office
County: Elmore
Presiding Judge: Wallace Capel
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42:2000
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
October 25, 2016 18 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDERED as follows: 1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. # 17 ) is ADOPTED; 2. Defendant's motion to dismiss (Doc. # 6 ) is DENIED; and 3. This case is referred to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 10/25/2016. (kh, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gunn v. Elmore County Board of Education
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Freddie Gunn
Represented By: Bridget M Ballentine
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Elmore County Board of Education
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?