Sorrells v. Jackson et al (INMATE 1)
Plaintiff: Albert J. Sorrells
Defendant: Greg Jackson
Case Number: 2:2017cv00083
Filed: February 13, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
Office: Montgomery Office
County: Covington
Presiding Judge: Gray M. Borden
Presiding Judge: W. Harold Albritton
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 25, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER that: 1. The 19 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; 2. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff's failure to comply with the orders of this court; 3. No costs are taxed. A separate Final Judgment will be entered. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 8/25/2017. (dmn, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sorrells v. Jackson et al (INMATE 1)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Albert J. Sorrells
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Greg Jackson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?