Battle v. Mays (INMATE 2)
Plaintiff: Antonio Dentray Battle
Defendant: Mr. Mays
Case Number: 2:2017cv00228
Filed: April 17, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
Office: Montgomery Office
County: Elmore
Presiding Judge: Terry F. Moorer
Presiding Judge: W. Harold Albritton
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 27, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 86 ORDER: it is ORDERED as follows: 1) The 85 Objection is OVERRULED; 2) The 83 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; 3) The Dfts' 16 & 37 Motions for Summary Judgment are GRANTED; 4) This case is DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Honorable Judge R. Austin Huffaker, Jr on 7/27/2020. (wcl, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Battle v. Mays (INMATE 2)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Antonio Dentray Battle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mr. Mays
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?