Jones v. Dunn et al (INMATE 1)
| Marcus Antonio Jones |
| Jefferson S. Dunn, Karla Walker Jones, Eric Evans and Officer Nolin |
| 2:2017cv00342 |
| May 26, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Montgomery Office |
| Montgomery |
| Susan Russ Walker |
| William Keith Watkins |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
35
ORDER: On January 8, 2021, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals construed Plaintiff's June 16, 2020 filing (Doc. 30 ) as a notice of appeal of the June 15, 2020 final judgment. (Doc. 31 .) On January 29, 2021, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals granted Plaintiff an extension of time until February 26, 2021, to file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. (Doc. 34 .) In the interest of efficiency and for the benefit of Plaintiff, it is ORDERED that the notice of appeal (Doc. 30 ) is construed as containing a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. "An appeal may not be taken in forma pauperis if the trial court certifies in writing that it not taken in good good faith." 28 U.S.C. 1915(a). In making that determination, the court uses an objective standard, such as whether the appeal is "frivolous," or "has no substantive merit." Applying this standard, the court is of the opinion, for the reasons stated in the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. 27 ) and the Order adopting the Recommendation (Doc. 28 ), that Plaintiff's appeal is without a legal or factual basis and accordingly is frivolous for purposes of Plaintiff's motion. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis (Doc. 30 ) is DENIED. Signed by Honorable Judge William Keith Watkins on 2/2/2021. Furnished Appeals Clerk. (dmn, )
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER: it is ORDERED as follows: 1) The 27 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; 2) Defendant's 8 motion for summary judgment is GRANTED; and; 3) Costs are taxed against Plaintiff. Signed by Honorable Judge William Keith Watkins on 6/15/2020. (am, )
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER ON MOTION: Upon review of the 16 document filed by the plaintiff on 2/26/2018, which the court construes as a motion to amend the complaint to clarify that the plaintiff seeks monetary damages from defendant James Nolin in this defendant's individual capacity, it is ORDERED that this motion be and is hereby GRANTED. Signed by Honorable Judge Susan Russ Walker on 7/15/2019. (kr, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
