Steel v. Viscofan USA, Inc. et al
||Viscofan USA, Inc., Viscofan SA, Master Automatismos SL, Disenos Y Proyetos Electronics and Kuko
||May 31, 2017
||US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
||Gray M. Borden
|Nature of Suit:
||Personal Injury- Product Liability
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|May 21, 2019
ORDER that: 1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. 70 ) be and is hereby ADOPTED. 2. Defendant Viscofan, SA's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 52 ) is DENIED. 3. Defendant Viscofan, SA is directed to file an answer to Plaintiff's Complaint by 6/4/2019. 4. Defendant Viscofan SA's objections are hereby OVERRULED. Signed by Honorable Judge Andrew L. Brasher on 5/21/2019. (dmn, )
|December 1, 2017
OPINION AND ORDER directing that: (1) the 19 Report and Recommendation of the magistrate judge is adopted; (2) plf's 8 Motion to Remand is denied; this case is referred back to the magistrate judge for further proceedings. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 12/1/17. (djy, )
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?