Pearson v. Hartley et al (INMATE 1)
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|March 9, 2018
ORDER that the 18 Motion is DENIED and the Order Adopting Recommendation and Final Judgment entered on 2/7/2018 (Docs. 9 & 10 ) remain in full force and effect. As the court stated in a previous Order (Doc. 16 ), the plaintiff is advised that this court will not address any additional statements filed herein referencing facts or arguments relevant to his 1997 robbery convictions as such statements are not relevant to the disposition of this 42 U.S.C. 1983 action. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 3/9/2018. (dmn, )
|February 7, 2018
ORDER: This cause is before the court on the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge entered on 1/11/2018 (Doc. 8 ). There being no timely objection to the Recommendation, and after review of the file, the Recommendation is ADOPTED, and it is h ereby ORDERED as follows: 1. The plaintiffs claims against John Hartley are DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to the provisions of 28 USC 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). 2. The plaintiffs claims against District Attorney Ellen Brooks and the Attorney General for t he State of Alabama are DISMISSED with prejudice in accordance with the directives of 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and (iii). 3. The plaintiffs challenges to the constitutionality of the robbery convictions imposed upon him by the Circuit Court of Mo ntgomery County, Alabama on 3/3/1997 are DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) as such claims are not properly before the court in this cause of action. 4. This case is DISMISSED prior to service of process in accordance with the directives of 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(i), (ii) and (iii). A separate Final Judgment will be entered in accordance with this order. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 2/7/2018. (dmn, )
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?