Lewis v. Berryhill
Plaintiff: David Lee Lewis, Sr.
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Case Number: 2:2017cv00790
Filed: November 17, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
Office: Montgomery Office
County: Butler
Presiding Judge: Wallace Capel
Nature of Suit: Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 31, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 23 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: the decision of the Commissioner will be REVERSED and REMANDED pursuant to sentence four of 42 USC 405(g) by separate judgment so that the Commissioner can conduct additional proceedings consistent with this opinion. Signed by Honorable Judge Susan Russ Walker on 5/31/2019. (cnw, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lewis v. Berryhill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: David Lee Lewis, Sr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?