Guy v. Madix, Inc.
Linda Guy |
Madix, Inc. |
2:2019cv00109 |
February 6, 2019 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
Myron H Thompson |
Susan Russ Walker |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 6, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 UNIFORM SCHEDULING ORDER: An on-the-record Pretrial Conference is set for 7/16/2020 at 10:00 AM in Montgomery, Alabama before Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson. Jury Trial set for 8/24/2020 at 10:00 AM in Montgomery, Alabama before Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson. Amended Pleadings due by 6/7/2019. Discovery due by 12/20/2019. Motions due by 1/17/2020. Mediation Notice due by 12/27/2019. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 3/22/2019. Furnished calendar group, AG.(dmn, ) |
Filing 9 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Holmes, John) |
Filing 8 RULE 26(f) ORDER: it is ORDERED that the Rule 26(f) report containing the discovery plan shall be filed as soon as practicable, as further set out in order; Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 3/22/2019. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 3/1/2019. (wcl, ) |
***PURSUANT TO THE #6 ANSWER - Attorney Stephanie H. Mays,William Brock Phillips for Madix, Inc. added. (No pdf attached to this entry) (wcl, ) |
Filing 7 Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement by Madix, Inc.. (Holmes, John) |
Filing 6 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Madix, Inc..(Holmes, John) |
Filing 5 Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement by Linda Guy re #4 Notice of Deficiency requiring filing of Corporate Disclosure/Conflict Statement. (McPhillips, Julian) |
Filing 4 Notice of Deficiency requiring filing of Corporate Disclosure/Conflict Statement sent to Linda Guy; Corporate Disclosures due by 2/19/2019. (Attachments: #1 Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Attachment)(alm, ) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed; Madix, Inc. served on 2/7/2019, answer due 2/28/2019. (alm, ) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Madix, Inc. & returned to counsel for personal service by process server. (alm, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Madix, Inc. (Filing fee $ 400.00, receipt number 4602052310), filed by Linda Guy. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Civil Cover Sheet, #6 Receipt)(alm, ) |
DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Linda Guy. (No pdf attached to this entry - See doc #1 for pdf) (alm, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Guy v. Madix, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Madix, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Stephanie H. Mays |
Represented By: | William Brock Phillips |
Represented By: | John Barksdale Holmes, III |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Linda Guy | |
Represented By: | Julian Lenwood McPhillips, Jr. |
Represented By: | Chase Elliot Estes |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.