Benoit v. United States of America (INMATE 3)
Aundel Benoit |
United States of America and Walter Woods |
2:2019cv00560 |
August 5, 2019 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
Charles S Coody |
William Keith Watkins |
Prisoner: Vacate Sentence |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 2 ORDER: it is ORDERED that 1) The instant #1 petition be construed as a motion to vacate under 28 USC 2255; 2)The United States of America shall henceforth be listed as the sole respondent in this case; 3) On or before 8/21/2019, Benoit shall inform the court if he wishes to do one of the following: (a) Continue to proceed only on the claims he presents in the construed 2255 motion; or (b) Amend the construed 2255 motion to assert any additional claims he wishes to assert under 2255 in challenging his conviction and sentence; or (c) Withdraw the construed 2255 motion and dismiss this action, as further set out in order. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 8/6/2019. (cnw, ) |
Filing 1 (Construed as a 2255 Motion pursuant to the Court's #2 Order) PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Aundel Benoit. (No Filing Fee; No IFP) (bes, ) Modified on 8/6/2019 (cnw, ). |
MOTION to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (2255), filed by Aundel Benoit, as construed in the Court's #2 order. (No pdf attached to this entry - see doc #1 for pdf)(cnw, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.